Wednesday, May 8, 2019

City Nature Challenge 2019 Results


     This year's friendly global citizen science competition, the City Nature Challenge, ended up with 159 cities competing! These cities tried to get people out making nature observations using the free iNaturalist application to take photos that were uploaded during a 4 day competition to see who could get the most people involved, make the most observations, and identify (through crowd sourcing) the most species. These could all later be data mined by researchers and others to provide information for various projects.


     This year the Greater Washington DC Region once again did very well, despite there being more cities competing this year from the 68 that participated last year. Reporting 29,976 observations, the DC Region came in 10th overall, behind, in this order: Cape Town, La Paz, San Francisco (who helped start the challenge), San Diego County, Tena (Ecuador), Klang Valley (Malaysia), Dallas/Fort Worth, Los Angeles, and Hong Kong. You can find out more about the City Nature Challenge, including details of the leaderboard here: http://citynaturechallenge.org/ . For a summary from the Academy of Sciences, look here: https://calacademy.org/press/releases/city-nature-challenge-results-in-nearly-1-million-wildlife-observations.
     As many other parts of the world have much greater biodiversity, the DC Region placed quite well coming in 15th on the globe with 2,261 species tallied. But where our area really stood out was in participation. The 1,259 particpants who entered their observations placed DC 4th overall! Only the 2 original founding member cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles, followed by La Paz placed better. What a wonderful testament to the interest in nature and the willingness to participate in citizen science the nation's capital has to show!

A Nessus Sphinx Moth found in the Barcroft Natural Resource Conservation Area

     Locally, I'd like to feature Arlington, which while part of he DC Region team, did fairly well on its own. It contributed 4,635 observations of 803 species entered by 163 observers. The Mayapple was the commonly reported plant while the American Robin was the commonly reported animal.  It will take quite a while to go over all the individual species reported and see if any should be further investigated, but the data is now there to do so. More over, 3 Arlington County staff placed in the top 11 in the DC region for species tallied.
     I personally had my best City Nature Challenge ever, and am happy that I tallied 880 observations and topped the leaderboard with 430 species reported. That species count overall was good enough to place 25th in the whole global challenge.


     So lots of reasons to be happy: with how great the DC region did, how Arlington did, and my personal tallies. But more importantly, I am so happy that 159 cities decided they would participate, that 32,781 people entered 32,781 observations, entering data on 31,837 species. What a great commitment to citizen science, to pride in what nature is found close to them, and that they were willing to have some great fun while in this friendly global competition. Now I can't wait until next year!


    

Friday, April 19, 2019

Participate in the City Nature Challenge 2019!

City Nature Challenge 2019!

     A friendly global challenge was issued this year: Which cities could engage the most people to record the most observations of wildlife and plants, and find the most species over 4 days, April 26-29?  In last year's global event, 68 cities participated and tallied 441,888 observations by 17,329 people. This year is even bigger! There are over 160 cities worldwide who have answered the call!
     The first City Nature Challenge started as Citizen Science Day, with citizen science teams at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and California Academy of Sciences challenging one another into what turned out to be an eight-day friendly competition in April of 2016 between Los Angeles and San Francisco, engaging residents and visitors in documenting nature to better understand urban biodiversity. It grew to 16 cities in 2017, and went international in 2018.
     The free iNaturalist app (https://www.inaturalist.org/) is now the standard way for bioblitzes and other citizen science (the involvement of the general public in scientific research and data collection) projects to record information and is what most cities will use for recording City Nature Challenge observations, including the team here in the Washington, DC Metro area. The beauty of the app is that with a simple uploaded photo, crowd sourcing can then help identify the organism and the observation is recorded so that worldwide any researchers can data mine the info they need. You never know what piece of data you could be providing some researcher somewhere in the world. You don't even need to know what you're reporting (though the iNaturalist app has a neat suggested identification feature to provide likely ID possibilities and there's a neat new Seek app that can help ID things on the spot (https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/seek_app) too!). This is due to the crowd sourcing that allows other perhaps more knowledgeable people to provide their ID skills. A short instructional video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/246153496



 
The DC Metro Area did very well indeed in this global event last year:
     Its 22,809 observations was 5th place overall, behind San Francisco which started the competition 3 years ago (41,737 observations), Dallas/Fort Worth (34,218 observations), San Diego (33,448 observations), and Klang Valley/Greater Kuala Lumpur (25,287 observations). Just behind DC were Houston followed by New York. Coming in last was Palmer Station Antarctica which understandably only had 36 observations (but 27 species with only 3 people in Antarctica of all places!). Globally 124 new species were added to the iNaturalist data base that had not been present before.
     As far as participation, the DC region again did wonderfully! It came in 4th place overall with 876 participants who made observations. This was behind San Francisco (1,532 observers), San Diego County (1211 observers), Boston (992 observers), and just ahead of Los Angeles (which also started the competition 3 years ago, with 855 observers). With over 40 planned DC regional events over the competition period, it turned out those group events really paid off.
     The DC Metro Area also did remarkably well with its species count, considering some tropical places have so much more biodiversity. The DC Metro Area came in 8th overall with 1,855 verified species observed.

Among one of neat findings was this Southern Adder's Tongue Fern at Huntley Meadows Park
      Arlington had a good showing overall as well for the DC region it was included in. Of the over 40 DC Metro Area planned events, Arlington led or had a leading partner role in 25 of them. Within Arlington County itself, 134 observers tallied 3,957 observations and identified 644 species. The top observed species for Arlington were the American Robin (reported 46 times) and Virginia Creeper (reported 46 times). Some unusual sightings will need to be investigated and verified as they might prove to be very interesting. While some are positive, the observations of potential new invasive plants are also important to know about, and a few were indeed reported. Overall, a very respectable showing and demonstration of Arlington’s commitment to citizen science.
     This year, the DC area has over 124 events planned, with numerous organizations, local jurisdictions, and individuals planning to participate. You can find out more about the DC Metro Area events here: https://citynaturechallengedc.org/ (including Capital Naturalist events). The Arlington County sponsored events are here: https://parks.arlingtonva.us/nature-history/city-nature-challenge/ . More Arlington events sponsored by the Arlington Regional Master Naturalists here: https://www.signupgenius.com/go/60b0b4fa8ab22a31-arlington
     Whether you'd like to join one of these organized events or go solo, what great fun and discovery! What's not to like about that? So here's to the City Nature Challenge, as a fun way to make nature discoveries in our wonderfully diverse region while providing valuable scientific data! So please do participate!



Saturday, February 23, 2019

Bee Nesting Structures

An Eastern Carpenter Bee and numerous mason bees make use of two artificial bee structures.

     About 30% of our region’s 450 or so bees nest above ground. Many do so in dead trees, borer beetle burrows, and in stems of plants with soft or hollow stems and piths like elderberry, sunflower, sumac, and blackberries. This is one more reason to leave garden plants standing through the winter, as many are housing insects in various parts of their life cycle, including pupating or adult overwintering bees. Ecologically minded gardeners don’t tidy up (unless removing diseased plants) until spring, along with of course planting non-cultivar native plants. Even better is to cut the tops off about a foot high, leaving the stems for bees and other insects to use for the following season. Since many bees need help in getting into a stem, the open tops are perfect for this. Native plants not only provide nesting and nectar sources, but 35% our native bees are oligolectic, needing the specific pollen of the plants they evolved with in order to be able to reproduce. 

An Elderberry shows signs of where woodpeckers have foraged for mason and other cavity nesting bees.

    These mostly solitary bees include Small Carpenter Bees (Genus Ceratina, about 24 species in North America, 4 locally), Large Carpenter Bees (Genus Xylocopa, only the Eastern Carpenter Bee, X. virginica, is common around the DC region, though the Southern Carpenter Bee, X. micans, has been found in southern Virginia), Leafcutters (Genus Megachile, about 130 species in NA), Mason Bees (Genus Osmia, about 150 species in NA, 27 east of the Mississippi, though several other Genera such as Hoplitis and Chelostroma are also often called mason bees), and a few other types which use cavities or take advantage of above ground structures.

A male Eastern Carpenter Bee nectars at a Swamp Milkweed. Many cavity nesting bee males have white faces. More on Eastern Carpenter bees: http://capitalnaturalist.blogspot.com/2014/10/carpenter-bees.html

     After planting native plants, limiting use of pesticides/ herbicides/fungicides, leaving garden bed plants standing throughout the winter, leaving some old stems standing cut a foot or so high, and allowing your lawns to have some clover and other perhaps weedy looking flowers, there are some other things that you can do to make your yard more bee friendly and appealing to many pollinators. In many parts, bee/insect “hotels” are becoming quite popular. 

An insect hotel geared for bees at Audubon Naturalist Society headquarters in Maryland.

     But you needn’t make things so extravagant, unless of course you want to. While there are numerous types of bees that will make use of artificial structures, mason bees are the most common, and luckily what works for them will generally work for others. Simply changing the size of the openings to the structures often is enough for the other cavity nesting bees (and many other insects). 

Blue Orchard Mason Bee, the most common native mason bee.

     Mason bees (including Osmia lignaria and others) are small, dark bees that do not live in large social hives, but are actually solitary (like most of our 4,000 species of native bees in North America). They tend to be primarily active in the spring. They also can work at lower temperatures than the introduced European honey bee. They are very peaceful, only using their weak sting if grabbed or trapped inside clothing and do not swarm. Although not honey producers, they are superb pollinators, especially under questionable spring time conditions. Individuals supposedly can visit more plants per hour and in many cases can be up to 90% more efficient at pollination than the introduced European honey bees. Mason bees also carry their pollen on their hair (scopa) underneath their body so often pollinate more flowers than honeybees that carry their pollen moistened in “baskets” on their back legs (leading to less pollen contact with another flower). This pollen also tends to be dry and pollinates easily where honeybees often use nectar to wet the pollen they carry so it does not fall off as easily to pollinate the flower. Mason bees tend to prefer flowering shrubs over plants but will visit whatever is available. Two introduced Japanese Horned Mason Bees are also becoming quite numerous in our area, and are the most likely ones you will attract. In the wild, orchard mason bees (as they are sometimes called) use hollow stems or cavities in trees to nest in (they do not make their own holes). Many commercially available bee houses with replacement tubes are sold for them to utilize. It is also quite easy to make some suitable homes for them. One simple way is to cut some bamboo, Phragmites (a good use for both these invasives), elderberry, and/or sumac at their nodes, hollow them out all the way to the node so one side is still sealed, and bundle them together (with the open ends facing one direction) for the bees to discover. Place them where they will get some sun in the morning and some shelter from the rain. The bundles do not have to be all even at the open end since that makes it even easier for the bees to orient themselves to their own nests. From 5-8 inches long is fine. Various entrance-hole sizes will work but a good compromise size is 5/16inch in diameter.


A structure supporting both blocks with drilled holes and bamboo built as an Eagle Scout project as part of a pollinator patch in Arlington Virginia.

     Another way is to drill some 5/16in diameter holes (or you can vary hole sizes) in some untreated pieces of wood (sections of 2x4’s or bigger is even better). Make each hole ¾ inches apart from any other on all sides. The deeper the holes the better (6 inches or so but again not all the way through) since female eggs are laid towards the rear of any tunnels. The more longer-lived females you have, the faster your population can grow. Luckily nesting bees show great nest fidelity and tend to try and use the same area each time. Place the pieces of lumber so they can get morning sun and some protection from the elements much as you would with the bamboo and other cut stems. Some large diameter wire screen across the front will help keep woodpeckers or rodents from eating them, but still allows the bees to do their thing (something smaller than chicken-wire).     
     Provide some moist soil nearby (preferably clay based) so they can construct their nest cells. Try to have your nesting structures for them out by mid-March around here since more female are produced earlier in the year than later. The bees tend to be active for just a little over a month each (each bee lays about 35 eggs) so you want to be ready for them. This works for most blue orchard bees, but there are many other different bee species. For this reason, some people experiment with different size holes to attract whatever local types might be around.  In the Fall, some people put the nests in a cool place like a shed to protect them from predators. Other people carefully remove the containers (straws or open plastic tubes often commercially) as they fill and put out fresh nesting holes. The stored containers should be placed right-side up with the mud-sealed openings towards the top, in a protected shed or other place that undergoes conditions similar to the outdoors.
  Care should be taken not to jostle them very much so as to not dislodge the developing young or eggs.  Some people even refrigerate them after September and “activate” them just before they need them for their orchards or plants. For more instructions on building or providing bee “homes” check out the Xerces Society: http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/nests_for_native_bees1.pdf.

A commercial mason bee system consisting of cardboard straws with paper inserts that can be cleaned and replaced yearly.

     Commercially available systems and boxes are sold and most work fairly well. Most people agree that paper straw inserts and tubes will work, but some are better than others. Waxed paper tubes tend to keep the nectar from drying out and are an improvement and those made out of cardboard are even better. Wood is best since it offers the best protection from predators like Chalcid wasps but can’t be re-used too often without parasite problems (unless you use paper straw inserts in them). Bamboo and plant stems can crack and offer less protection from predators or parasites. The bees also prefer darker colors and you should also try not to clump too many holes or tubes together since the bees can get disoriented as to which exact hole is theirs. Some folks insert different color paper straws to help the bees find their own home easier or simply paint the edges different colors to help the bees orient themselves. Plastic straws do not work and lead to fungal problems.  
 
A Blue Orchard Mason Bee utilizing a commercial plastic bee box system which can be pulled apart for cleaning and has multiple colors to help the bees find their individual holes.

     Populations often build quite well from year to year. But there are issues with placing so many solitary bees so close together. This unnatural situation attracts many predators. More so, it allows for the build-up of illness, fungal issues, and parasites. For that reason many people change them out or clean them yearly. After several years, many also move the structures to new areas. All this helps with these high population issues. 
 
A Leucopis Chalcid Wasp searches for a place to insert her ovipositor to parasitize a mason bee tube.

 
A male mason bee covered in pollen mites. In large numbers, these can be harmful to bees. Populations can build up in colonies or when using the same holes/tubes each year.




      As mentioned, 2 nonnative Japanese horned bees (the Japanese Hornfaced Bee Osmia cornifrons and the Taurus Mason Bee Osmia taurus) are now quite prevalent and are the most likely mason bee to be attracted, as they are less picky about where they nest and reproduce quickly. Whether or not they are harmful to the native bees through competition for limited nesting sites or nectar sources may yet need to be proven, but I’ve noticed that as the nonnative numbers build, the native blue orchard native bees, and leafcutter bees who also may use the nesting tubes later in the season start to decline.
 
The two Japanese Hornfaced bees are the most likely mason bees to be attracted to man-made structures. As is sometimes the case for cavity nesting bees, the male is smaller, has a white face, and longer antennae.




     There’s also a much larger nonnative bee, the Giant Resin Bee (Megachile sculpturalis) that is now getting common in our area. They compete with cavity nesting bees, and I believe they will pull out or disturb the other bees’ nests when they can, nesting later than many native bees. For more about them, read this blog article I put together on them: https://capitalnaturalist.blogspot.com/2015/07/giant-resin-bees.html.

Two nonnative Giant Resin Bees fight over a nesting space. Notice one has pollen all over its scopa, or belly "hairs".

    Many other types of bees, wasps and other creatures make use of these type of nesting structures too, including mason wasps, leafcutter bees, and grass-carrying wasps.

A Grass-carrying wasp has made its nest among numerous mason bee nests.



Though it may look very similar, the smooth features make this more likely to be a mason wasp rather than mason bee.

     So do your part and become a bee rancher yourself. You’ll be amazed at the activity and the new mini ecosystem that develops around the nests, while you benefit these neat pollinators and your garden as well.                                                                                                                                     
   
Bee/Pollinator Basics
   
  • Avoid using pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides when possible.
  • Plant for continuous blooms throughout the season (so you have continuous food sources).
  • Use mass plantings as it's easier to see a bunch of plants blooming when flying than single blooms.
  • Include native host plants for caterpillars and oligolectic (specific pollen requiring) bees.
  • Provide basking spots when possible.
  • Consider puddling areas for butterflies and mud plots for certain bees and wasps.
  • Try to locate your garden in the sunniest location you have for best bloom production.
  • Consider flower color and shape (reds are the worst, blue/white/yellow open top flowers that serve as landing platforms are the best. Composite flowers supply multiple food sources per landing).
  • Avoid double-flowered or other cultivars/nativars as they often sacrifice nectaries for more showy petals. 
  • GO NATIVE!  As evolution provided flower colors and shapes that pollinators found attractive rather than cultivated or introduced plants that people find attractive, best not to gamble and go with non-cultivars or nativars (very few of which have ever been tested for attractiveness to pollinators rather than people). Choose native plants, its what the pollinators chose and evolved.


Picky About Pollen

      About 35% of our bees are specialists, depending on a limited range of plants (usually a genus or family) to collect pollen (though they can often nectar at many more). They cannot reproduce without the specific pollen of these plants they evolved with. They are oligolectic. If they collect pollen from a single species they are monolectic. If they use various plants they are polylectic.


Some particular pollen producing plants for specialist bees:
  •  Blueberries & Deerberries (Vacciniums)- at least 5 bee pollen specialists
  • Native Loosestrifes (Lysimachia) - at least 3 oil collecting bee specialists
  • Hollies (Ilex)
  •  Ironweeds (Vernonias) - at least 2 bee pollen specialists
  • Willows (Salix) - at least 8 bee pollen specialists
  • Native Thistles (Cirsium) 
  • Pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) - at least 3 pollen specialists
  • Ground Cherries (Physalis) - at least 3 specialists
  • Goldenrods (Solidago) - a t least 11 bee pollen specialists
  • Asters (Symphyotrichum) - 8 specialists
  • Aster Family - at least 131 specialist bee associations
  • Rose Family - at least 102 specialist bee associations






Bee Nesting Structure Basics
  • Most spring time solitary bees tend to use the same areas each year very early in the season, so try to have bee nests/structures out by early March.
  • Bees, like most other insects are "cold blooded" not producing internal heat, so placing basking sites and nesting structures so they catch the morning sun but are out of the baking afternoon sun work best.
  •  Bees lay female-producing eggs the deepest in the holes/tubes that they can while male-producing eggs are closest to the entrance hole. To maximize the number of reproducing females tubes/holes should be 5-8inches deep.
  • While 5/16inch diameter holes are a good compromise for many bees, vary hole sizes to attract different bees and wasps. 
  • For better predator and parasite protection, most bees prefer structures and tubes/holes that are sealed off in the back.
  •  As most of the bees attracted are solitary, packing them close together attracts predators and parasites. Sanitary conditions of clean or new tubes/holes are best. Consider moving the colony every few years.
  •  Do not move structures once they are start being actively used. Each bee remembers where its individual hole is locates, so moving them often disorients and often leads to them abandoning their nests.Make sure they don't sway or move.
  •  In addition to having nearby nectar/pollen sources, mud sources are used by many bees and wasps, so maybe good to provide or have nearby.
  • Provide protection form the rain and wind when possible, such as under roofs or eaves if the structure is not built with these protections in place. 
  • Consider placing large screen in front of of bee structures that have openings to easily let bees through but still protect against predators. 
  • Once all the holes/tubes are filled and sealed, they can be moved with no harm (perhaps to be stored in a cool garage or shed where they may be protected but  still experience cold so as to not emerge early.
                

Friday, February 1, 2019

Lesser Scaup


A Lesser Scaup drake, or male Bluebill. In addition to the bill color, notice the peaked head.

     Lesser Scaup (Athya affinis) are the most common of our freshwater diving or bay ducks, referred to as pochards in other parts of the globe. Though often just called divers, pochards around the world (there are 16 species in 2 different Genera worldwide) share some similar traits. First of all, most do not inhabit oceans and swim using only their feet (which like other diving birds are placed well back on their bodies). Sea ducks use their wings as well as their feet when swimming. Most male freshwater diving ducks also have similar plumage patterns, of dark patches with light colors (but no colorful patches on their wings), bright colored eyes, and very similar voices due to having the same voice box apparatus (called fenestrated bullae). They all share a common ancestor.
     All Scaup are often called "Bluebills" by hunters and others due to the color of their beaks, which are also tipped in black. Lesser Scaup (sometimes referred to as Little Bluebills) are medium sized ducks, males averaging 1.8lbs, females 1.6lbs. They were first described by an English naturalist named Thomas Campbell Eytan in 1838. The Genus name Athya is Greek for "sea bird". The other members of the Genus, all winter visitors here in the DC region are: Canvasback, Redhead, Ring-necked Duck, and the very similar Greater Scaup. Greater Scaup are larger, have wider beaks (sometimes they're called Broadbills), longer white wing stripes, and rounded heads. Lesser Scaup are smaller, with thinner bills, shorter white wing stripes, and a peaked appearance to their heads. While some claim that Greater Scaup have a greenish look to their heads as compared to the purplish gloss of the Lesser, this is for all practical purposes useless in the field. As a general rule Lesser Scaup do prefer smaller bodies of water and freshwater, while the much less numerous Greater Scaup prefer open and often brackish or saltwater. There is tremendous overlap however and mixed flocks of both can be found, especially the closer you get to the coast. Occasionally both scaup may hybridize or do so with ring-necked ducks as well.
     The word "scaup" some say is a corruption of the Scottish term "scalp" referring to clams, oysters, and mussels that are favored prey items. Others think it's due to a corruption of Dutch or French wording for scallops. Others think it's due to the sound made by the hen.
     Although they feed quite a bit on mollusks as mentioned, either diving or just tipping up to grab them, scaup also feed on plants, seeds and other invertebrates. They seem to really like amphipods such as scuds. Unlike most diving ducks, they may feed at night.
     Since scaup feed on a fair amount of plant material, they do not have the extreme fishy taste of some other diving ducks and are thus considered mild tasting table fare. They are considered much less wary than other divers, and are said to decoy and be lured in fairly well. As they are also the most numerous of all diving ducks, they are often hunted.
     But their numbers are historically down, dropping 59% since 1966. The reasons are not well understood as to why, as they nest in the upper Northwest and in many areas in fairly undisturbed land. Conservation efforts and stricter game laws have not seemed to make any difference. Many think that the declines may be due to climate change, though their numbers are still considered to be secure. Estimates are that there some 3.8 million Lesser Scaup, though their similarity to Greater Scaup (who do nest somewhat more Northwards) makes accurate counts difficult.
     Scaup nest in the pothole areas of the upper Northwest of Canada and Alaska. They are among the last birds to start migration, often waiting until the waters are frozen, forcing them to begin their journeys to wintering grounds. Their migration is often a very drawn out affair. Interestingly, their migration patterns have changed historically, with now many wintering over in the Great Lakes area, many think to take advantage of eating the now numerous numbers of the invasive introduced Zebra Mussels. As these mollusks filter out quite a bit of pollutants and contaminates, some think this may be unhealthy for the ducks. They are also among the last waterfowl to return in the spring, some still migrating in mid May. They are considered the most southerly of our migrating diving ducks, some reaching South America, the Caribbean, and occasionally straying into the Pacific and Europe.
     But when they arrive at their wintering grounds, they do so in a splendid manner. Rafts (flocks of ducks on the water) of hundreds and even thousands of birds are not rare. While they prefer the company of their own kind, they will sometimes have mixed flocks, particularly with other freshwater divers like Greater Scaup or Ring-necked Ducks.

A drake (male) Lesser Scaup mixed in with a small group of Ring-neck drakes.
 
     Scaup form new pair bonds yearly while overwintering. They are among the last ducks to pair up. Males make up 70% or so of the population, so finding a hen to pair up with is not always easy. Scaup are usually at least two years old before mating. Interestingly, the males also do not stay with the hen for very long after she starts nesting.     Hens choose dry areas within 200' of water to nest in, which is different from other diving ducks who often nest precariously near water. Scaup actually lay their eggs while still building their nests, 8-14 olive buff eggs. Older hens lay more eggs and have a better success rate than younger birds. Hens have been known to dump their eggs into the nests of other scaup.The eggs hatch between 21-28 days later. As soon as the fluffy down on the young dries, they can dive underwater to escape danger. Adults have been known to play dead when grabbed by predators, though this has not been noted in ducklings. Often hens form creches, where 1-3 hens tend to the young of multiple nests. Young are abandoned early, often before the 49 or so days it takes them to learn how to fly. With a lot of luck, they can live up to 18 years.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019

City Nature Challenge DC 2019!

 
     "Citizen Science" is scientific research and data gathering that is conducted or assisted using public participation, often amateurs and nonprofessionals. Such public interest and wishing to contribute to science is a growing trend, providing many chances to tap into volunteers and collect data. All these extra eyes and ears (and photos) the public can provide can greatly expand how much certain forms of data can be collected. This is what citizen science is all about, with regular people providing useful data, but it also can provide great opportunities for education and public events.    
     Bioblitzes are probably the best known natural history citizen science events. These are typically periods of biological surveying in an attempt to record all the living species within a designated area. Groups of scientists, naturalists and public volunteers conduct intensive field study over a continuous time period (usually 24 hours) and record what they find. A Bioblitz provides a snap shot in time. While it is certainly not a complete record of what lives in the location, if you take enough snap shots over different times and seasons, you can get a good picture of what is going on there. 


     The free iNaturalist app is now more-or-less the standard way for bioblitzes and other citizen science projects to record natural history observations. The beauty of the app is that with a simple uploaded photo, crowd sourcing can then help identify the organism and the observation is recorded so that worldwide any researchers can data mine the info they need. You never know what piece of data you could be providing some researcher somewhere in the world. Here’s a link to various tutorials on how to use the free app: https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/video+tutorials.
     You don't even need to know what you're reporting (though the iNaturalist app has a neat suggested identification feature to provide likely ID possibilities as well). Thanks to crowd sourcing, other, perhaps more knowledgeable, people can provide their ID skills. The suggested ID feature also means that you can basically have a virtual field guide of sorts to use, though it is much better at some taxa than others. The iNaturalist platform can also help users setup different projects to provide ongoing check lists and biotic inventories of parks and other surveyed locations, large and small.  For a great summary of iNaturalist and its use in a bioblitz, setting, please check out this article and video by Steve Baragona of "Voice of America" which features a bioblitz we ran: https://www.voanews.com/a/forget-butterfly-nets-today-naturalists-capture-specimens-on-their-phones/3888031.html.

     The City Nature Challenge is another citizen science event, a friendly global citizen science competition to see which city can have the most people observe the most species of wildlife and plants and record them over a 4-day span of time. Last year 68 cities world-wide competed with many more planning to participate this year from April 26-29. These cities tallied 441,888 observations by 17,329 people. Think of it as a 4 day bioblitz in multiple cities across the globe which is planned to be repeated yearly.
     The next big opportunity, and it is repeated yearly, is the global City Nature Challenge April 26-29, 2019. So mark your calendars and give it a shot, either personally, as part of one of the many planned events, or perhaps to run an event yourself. More information can be found here: http://citynaturechallenge.org/ though there are many cities with their own individual websites as (here’s the Washington, DC one I’m taking part in again for example: https://citynaturechallengedc.org/).
     The DC Metro Area did very well indeed in this global event last year, hosting over 40 events. Its 22,809 observations was 5th place overall among all participating cities, behind San Francisco who originally started the competition 3 years ago (41,737 observations), Dallas/Fort Worth (34,218 observations), San Diego (33,448 observations), and Klang Valley/Greater Kuala Lumpur (25,287 observations). Just behind DC were Houston and then New York. Interesting to note was last place Palmer Station, which is perfectly understandable given its in Antarctica (!) with only 3 people posting 36 observations of 27 species. Just ahead of them was Buenos Aires (170 observations of 96 species by 18 people) and San Salvador (220 observations of 52 species using only 6 people). Worldwide, 124 new species were added the iNaturalist data base that had been present before, with Hong Kong providing 57 of them.

     As far as participation, the DC region again did wonderfully! It came in 4th place overall with 876 participants who recorded observations. This was behind San Francisco (1,532 observers), San Diego County (1,211 observers), and Boston (992 observers), while being ahead of Los Angeles, one of the original cities starting the competition with San Francisco, with 855 observers. With over 40 planned organized events, these group events really paid off.
     The DC Metro area also did remarkably well with its species counts, considering some of the tropical places have so much more potential biodiversity. The DC region came in 8th overall with 1,855 species observed.
     So join the fun this year! There are over 100 cities currently planning to participate during the April 26-29, 2019 Challenge. So save the dates as there will be many chances to participate, either on your own or with one of the myriad of events planned.  Learn more at https://citynaturechallengedc.org./
     Arlington events include a Barcroft Park Mini BioBlitz on Friday April 26 10am-1pm. More event info and to register, contact NaturalResources@arlingtonva.us or call 703-228-7742. And a City Nature Challenge at Gulf Branch nature Center Saturday April 27, from 10am-11:30am, for more info call 703-228-3403. 
     There will be several other events that the Capital Naturalist will be involved with, including a repeat of the fun trip I will lead to Thompson Wildlife Management Area in Linden, VA on Saturday, April 27 featuring the wonderful botanical discoveries and so much more that location has to offer. More to come on that later.
     On a personal note, the Capital Naturalist was proud to be a City Nature Challenge partner (and to be one again this year!) and to have led multiple events in the DC Metro Area. I’m even prouder to have had a good showing overall, with my 533 observations putting me in 5th place on the DC area leaderboard overall, and my 282 species identified placing me in first place in that category for the region. Better yet, it allowed me ample time outdoors with like-minded people making nature discoveries. What's not to like about that? So here's to the City Nature Challenge again this year, hoping to make even more observations, conducting some citizen science and showing the great diversity of the DC region! So save the dates (April 26-29) and plan on participating! if everyone makes just a few observations, we will surely win this friendly global competition, while having fun, contributing to citizen science, making some wonderful discoveries along the way, and showing the that the DC area has great diversity and interest in citizen science!